The Russell Group - Best Universities in the UK

79

By Singular Investor

The Russell Group of Best Universities in Britain

Which are the Best Universities in Great Britain?

If you want to see the list of best universities in Britain without the explanation then scroll down the page. If you want to read the explanation then read on. This site was first published here - The Russell Group

If you are thinking of applying to university in the UK then you may be wondering which are the best universities and which ones will give you the best job prospects once you leave university. Well the top 20 universities in the UK have very kindly joined forces in a 'club' which they call the Russell Group of universities.

Back in the 'good old days' everyone knew that Oxford and Cambridge were the best universities in the UK and indeed the world ! If you were very bright (or daddy was very rich) then you went to one of these two universities. After Oxford and Cambridge came the 'best of the rest' - places where students often considered themselves to be 'Oxbridge rejects'- places like Edinburgh, Bristol, London, and possibly a few more.

In the latest list of Best universities in the UK there are a number of universities that are in the top 10 universities but are not in the Russell Group e.g. Durham and Lancaster and St. Andrews - you can see current ratings for best univerities in Britian here - Best Universities in the UK


 After these came the old universities in major towns and cities followed by the newer universities. If you couldn't get in to one of these universities you applied to one of the many polytechnics around the country.

The End of the Polytechnics

Best Universities in Britain

St Johns College, Oxford University member of the Russell Group
St Johns College, Oxford University member of the Russell Group

In 1992, in a fit of egalitarianism zeal, and no doubt because someone thought there were votes to be had, the UK decided to put an end to polytechnics. They did this by changing their name and calling them universities. One of the aims was to put an end to elitism and have a more 'democratic' system. But a rose by any other name etc...

Human nature being what it is people want to get the best for themselves or their children if they possibly can, so going to the best univeristies is still important. One of the reasons being, of course, that your job prospects are greatly enhanced if you can say you went to Oxford University than if you went to Xtown Polytechnic. Every country in the world has its prestigious educational establishments for the intellectual or financially or politically well endowed elite and its ordinary establishments for everybody else. Even in places like the Soviet Union there were prestigious institutes and universities for the children of the great and the good. Absolute egalitarianism and equality of opportunity is just a dream I'm afraid.

The upshot for universities in Britain was that in 1994 a group of universities decided they need to form themselves into a select group which they named the ' Russell Group of Universities' (compared by some to the Ivy League in the USA) to distinguish themselves from the rest, or as they put it :

with the aim of :

  • maximising income for member institutions;
  • leading the research effort in the UK;
  • creating the regulatory environment needed to achieve these objectives by reducing government interference;
  • attracting the best staff and students;
  • identifying ways to co-operate to make best use of the universities' collaborative advantage.

They took the name the Russell Group from the Russell hotel in which the first meeting took place in Russell Square in London.

In the National Student Survey in the UK, Russell Group Universities get average to strong ratings but there are other universities that get better ratings. There are also universities not in the Group with higher levels of employment for graduates than Russell Group Universities.

The Russell Group Universities are, however, perceived as being among the best with regard to academic achievement, so get more applications from future undergraduates.

As a reaction to the Russell Group, 19 other research universities created the '1994 Group'. One criticism of the Russell Group of universitiies is that they place higher priority on research ratings and their teaching quality has suffered.

The Russell Group of Self-Declared Best Universities in Britain

The Twenty Russell Group Universities i.e. the Best Universities in the UK are (in alphabetical order):-

University of Birmingham
University of Bristol
University of Cambridge
Cardiff University
University of Edinburgh
University of Glasgow
Imperial College London
King's College London, University of London
University College London, University of London
University of Leeds
University of Liverpool
London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London
University of Manchester
Newcastle University
University of Nottingham
Queen's University Belfast
University of Oxford
University of Sheffield
University of Southampton
University of Warwick

The 19 Universities in the 1994 Group are : -

University of Bath
Birkbeck, University of London
Durham University
University of East Anglia
University of Essex
University of Exeter
Goldsmiths, University of London
Royal Holloway, University of London
Lancaster University
University of Leicester
Loughborough University
Queen Mary, University of London
University of Reading
University of St Andrews
School of Oriental and African Studies
University of Surrey
University of Sussex
University of York

Tour of St John's College, Oxford University

Comments

Alex ONeill profile image

Alex ONeill 2 years ago

Cool stuff. I had no idea about stuff like that in England. Pretty eye opening

Singular Investor profile image

Singular Investor Hub Author 2 years ago

You're really quick !

LondonGirl profile image

LondonGirl 2 years ago

Useful explanation of the Russell Group - nice one.

LondonGirl profile image

LondonGirl 2 years ago

Useful explanation of the Russell Group - nice one.

prasetio30 profile image

prasetio30 Level 8 Commenter 2 years ago

thanks for information. I have friend and now he is studying at Durham university. very nice hub.

Singular Investor profile image

Singular Investor Hub Author 2 years ago

Thanks for dropping by Prasetio - Durham is a very nice university and a very old one

Helen Tedcastle 15 months ago

If you look at the actual rankings of Universities in the Uk and the world, you will find that in fact many of the self-appointed elite of Russell group institutions fall behind those of the 1994 group Eg: Newcastle, Liverpool, Cardiff are well below rankings for Durham , York, Lancaster etc.. Russell group Unis may be biggest but they are not always the best.

Singular Investor profile image

Singular Investor Hub Author 15 months ago

Thanks for the comment Helen - yes, I agree, especially about Lancaster ! The Russell Group does seem a bit arbitrary the way it was put together, maybe they were the only ones that turned up to the meeting. In this day and age though branding is important. The other day there was a programme on TV about getting good jobs and they mentioned the Russell Group a number of times, there was no mention of the other very good universities that weren't in it. I suspect that over time people looking for 'good' universities to get a good job will only apply to those in the Russell Group, I also suspect that the Russell Group will expand to include more universities.

Me 13 months ago

The reason why places like Durham etc. are higher than Russell Group unis such as Cardiff is that the RG is a uni for large, research-intensive universities. These are the institutions with the highest research budgets in the UK, while the smaller universities like Durham do not have the same amount of students or research grants. This doesn't correlate to the quality of teaching, as we of course know (superstar academics devoting most of their time to research and ignoring the undergraduates).

Singular Investor profile image

Singular Investor Hub Author 13 months ago

Thanks for the info. Me - sounds like a reasonable argument. I'm surprised to learn that Durham is a small university though after all it has been around for a while. For what it's worth I went to Lancaster and the teaching was rather like the curate's egg - parts of it were very good (unfortunately most was decidedly average and some of it was toxic) all IMHO of course :-)

sarah 3 months ago

why are some Russell group universities so far down in the league table - Queens Belfast in the 50's so it cant be a top 20 making this concept nonsense. Another UK snobbish attempt at oneupmanship without logic.

Singular Investor profile image

Singular Investor Hub Author 3 months ago

Hi Sarah, - I don't know - Durham is not in the Russell Group which is odd as I had always heard it was one of the best universities in the UK - but elitism is alive and well and no doubt ever will be. I'm sure there are people who only consider Russell Group universities.

Gregg 3 months ago

Hi Sarah

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Group and then look at the research funding sections. If the primary definition of a university is a higher education establishment then these figures matter less. If the primary definition of a university is research institute then they matter a lot. It depends on your definition. I had a discussion once about how this should be defined. I argued that teaching and development of new talent is just as important as the research. However, the point was made that included in the definition of a university, which pretty much distinguishes them from other institutes, is that they have the ability to award PhDs. The other argument is how other university rankings are formulated - for instance - entry requirements are part of the calculation - meaning if a university decides that it will only let in people with certain grades regardless of the education they provide they will be higher in the rankings. When looking at any of these rankings the one I find most important is the value added score. But of course all these rankings only refer to undergraduate teaching not the research or academics that the university produces.

Gregg 3 months ago

Just to add sometimes you should look at the department / subject not the university. For instance, Salford University is ranked near the bottom of the standard (Guardian / Times) league tables. But its department for Building / Architecture / Civil Engineering is a top ranked EPSRC research establishment and in one research assessment was ranked only second to Cambridge.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working